Tidbits
SPRAGGETT ON CHESS
__________________________________________________________________________
I bet you never heard of the ICSC!
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEEOF SILENT CHESS
The International Committee of Silent Chess (I.C.S.C.) was founded in 1949 in Copenhagen (Denmark) and is recognised by Federation Internationale des Echecs (F.I.D.E.) and by the International Olympic Committee (I.O.C.); it publishes its periodical magazine “Mitteilungsblatt” (I.C.S.C. Bulletin) every four months.
The I.C.S.C. is an international organisation based on voluntary service. It establishes and organizes the World Individuals events for both Deaf men and women, World Teams Deaf Chess Championships, European, Asian (Continental) Clubs Chess Championships and friendly international tournaments.
____________________________________________________________________
Strange as it may seem, if you are legally deaf then you can participate in a sub-world of the sub-culture of chess! I am not sure why being deaf would affect a player’s ability to play chess, but in the spirit of bringing people together and promoting the game in more and more creative ways, why not?
Last year I wrote a blog entry on the ICSC :
You might want to check it out because it has more details. And if you are up to it, there is an Olympiad for the deaf to be held in Portugal starting today! Check it out at the ICSC website…
Here are some interesting posters of past championships. Really, organized chess for the deaf exists!
________________________________________________________________________________
THE FIDE ELECTIONS
I suppose you could not but notice that there has been a lull in the amount of sensationalist crap that is appearing in the non-chess media this past week. This is a good thing, in my opinion! I am sure that I am not alone when I say that there is really nothing more unbearable than when someone who does not know the difference between a pawn and a Knight tries to write about the complex intricacies (ie. bullshit) about how the chess world really works. Not only do they get it all wrong and appear biased in the process, but they often just look like parrots endlessly repeating what every other idiot is writing.
Makes one wonder if you can really believe anything the media writes about things that are actually serious!
Now that I got that off my chest, let’s get down to facts. Karpov’s campaign site (http://www.karpov2010.org/) as well as Ilyumzhinov’s campaign site (http://www.onefide.com/) have difficulty in getting any momentum going. They both appear as old-style sailing ships stalled in a windless ocean…
The aim is global domination, when the wind picks up again!
Karpov and Kasparov have not been able to exploit Arkady Dvorkovich’s on-going restructuring of the Russian Chess Federation, which I am told has the support of the vast majority of Russian grandmasters. Alexander Bakh has been retired, effectively, which is one of the more damaging aspects of Karpov’s campaign: Bahk was well respected in Russian chess circles and was an excellent organizer,perhaps the best in Russia. He will be hard to replace…but he will be replaced, if only for political expediency.
The 2-Ks and Bakh at the ‘palace coup’
Nigel Short is seen here with Angola’s Jaime and Jorge Anton, the President of the Portuguese Chess Federaton, who I assume acted as intermediary. Karpov offered the Angolan minister a vice-presidency of his new board, but was told that he wanted to see what Kirsan’s representative would offer first before deciding.
Then Nigel was off to Uganda and then Ethiopia. No news about his successes there in any media, chess or otherwise. Curiously, however, on Karpov’s campaign site this week , with conspicuous silence, there appeared the Angolan Flag among the list of countries that was supporting Karpov (!!).
There was no article mentioning that Karpov had gained Angola’s vote (which is usual when a prize catch is made–and Angola would be a prize for Karpov), nor was there any mention in any of the Angolan journals and newspapers that the Angolan Chess Federation had decided to vote for Karpov! Nor in any of the Portuguese media.
And it appears that yet one more ex-colleague of Karpov is siding with the Ilyumzhinov campaign: chessdom reports that Ivanchuk now openly favours the incumbent president! http://reports.chessdom.com/news-2010/ivanchuk-ukranian-media
”The leader of Ukrainian chess – Vassily Ivanchuk in his interview to “Vzgliad iz Odessy” said he was in favour of the incumbent President of the International Chess Federation (FIDE) Kirsan Ilyumzhinov taking this position again.
Ivanchuk preferred Ilyumzhinov to the other candidate – the 12th World Champion Anatoly Karpov. Vassily’s reason was that with Ilyumzhinov the life of chess professionals has become better.
As for the version that it would be much easier for Karpov, who is better known in the sport world outside chess, than Ilyumzhinov, to “promote” inclusion of chess into the programme of the Olympics, Ivanchuk thinks that first, it is not a fact. Second, Ivanchuk, with all due respect to wrestlers and athletes, has no wish to participate in the same Olympic Games with them, and prefers that chess stays aside, having its own Olympiad, as it is now. ”
I suppose the juicy news today is that Ilyumzhinov’s lawyers have finally filed papers for a libel suit against Karpov. If you remember correctly, Karpov mentioned something a while back about Ilyumzhinov being ”corrupt”.
No doubt the real reason for most of the silence in both camps is that this past week has just been business as usual: the FIDE election is not going to be won in the media, but in the back rooms. After all the huff and puff of endless communiques from Karpov’s campaign of how many European countries support him , the truth is that even if Kirsan were to give him all of Europe and all of the Americas, it won’t really matter much if Karpov does not make progress in Africa, Asia and the Pacific rim countries.
I understand that Karpov is running a very serious campaign, is actively calling his many chess-contacts that he has made over his long career and is asking for their support and help in swaying votes. Karpov is scheduled to visit South America sometime this month (Peru has been mentioned, but undoubtedly other stops will also be made). I hear that he intends to go to Malasia.
No doubt Karpov realizes that he is an underdog, but is serious about the FIDE presidency.
And what can we say of Kirsan’s campaign? If history is any indication, then we will only know how effective his backroom negotiating is once the election is held! But I would be surprised if Kirsan does not have already in his pocket some 60 to 70 votes. Being at the height of his popularity–and he is extremely popular today–barring a scandal or two, Kirsan has to be seen as the likely winner this time around.
Instead, especially with the CFC in such piss-poor shape, there has hardly been any transparency in any of its processes or decisions for a really long time now. The governors, in particular, have successively been reduced to a role of helpless spectator.
We have an absentee president who is bi-polar and can not handle stress, shows up at his government job about as often as his doctor lets him, has no internet at home because his wife won’t allow it. We should not be surprised that he is incapable of performing the responsibilities of his office. Eric Van Dusen’s most significant act this past year has been to deliberately shred potentially incriminating documents that might have tied many of his OCA buddies (including Hal Bond) to the disappearance of 120,000 dollars from Trillium.
Nobody knows where his side-kick VP is either, he has disappeared also. Clearly there is no leadership at all at any level and so it is not surprising that in this vacuum the problems that do arise do not get solved. ”Solutions” are not sought: decisions simply get imposed, as in the Bluvshtein/Livshits scandal.
If memory serves me well (it normally does!) in 2008 the CFC did not encounter any significant problems with the Selection Process–which is something of a record in the CFC!
That is because we had a president who–regardless of what you thought of his policies or how effective they were– was a hands on type of president and who was honest and would not stand for any tinkering with the rules or creative-bullshit interpretations.
And because David Lavin had been out of chess for such a long time (20 years or more) he had no idea of how much the ethics of the CFC leadership had deteriorated. For instance, on September 1, 2008 he wrote me with regards to a development regarding the 2008 National Team:
What David did not realize is that this is exactly the way the CFC had been running since 2000! And worse: the CFC later reached the point where it literally sold the team…(you will have to wait for my long awaited article on Canadian chess for these details) To David Lavin–a very successful businessman–the kind of stuff that had been taken as ‘normal’ by previous CFC administrations was a horror story and it was totally unacceptable! And I think most Canadians would think the same way….David naturally refused the offer of the donation.
Returning to this week’s favourite topic on the message boards in Canada, the 2010 National Team to represent Canada later in September, let me say that I don’t want to be too critical of those in charge of the Selection Process. I understand that when problems arose there was no one to turn to as the CFC executive has ceased to exist as a real body. (Hopefully that will change at this years AGM)
I congratulate Ron Livshits and Ilyia Bluvshtein for doing something that I have not seen happen before when similar scandals (or problems that have the potential to develop into scandals) have taken place in the CFC: coming forward and explaining their perspectives. This is a very positive precedent
I remember clearly when a similar selection scandal happened in 2006 (Chris Mallon was president): the CFC executive refused to even make public the name of the Olympiad Coordinator! There was zero transparency. Everything was a big secret. Even the contract that CFC signed with Brian Hartman selling the team was not made public: that is, it was RATIFIED by the governors without them ever seeing it!!
So, getting back to this year’s situation, I –as a member of the CFC–appreciate Ron and Ilyia coming forward. I believe that they both demonstrated good faith.
This does not mean that I agree with what they argue (I don’t!) or that I think they made the proper decisions once difficulties arose (I don’t think they tried very hard to look for alternate solutions. Instead they made easy, convenient and familiar decisions.). But given the circumstances, atleast we can see the process and where it failed.
As far as I am concerned, I believe that the Alberta Chess Association should take the CFC to court (they have the money to do this) for not following its own rules and sue them for every penny the CFC has.
Nikolay Noritsyn and Eric Hansen are both victims in this episode. Both are clearly talented youngsters and have a bright future ahead of them. No doubt Eric will have a bitter taste on his tongue for a long time to come whenever he thinks of the CFC, and that is understandable. When I was his age I experienced a similar victimization in dealing with the CFC and for 12 years I refused to have anything to do with the CFC and its National Team.
To Eric I suggest him follow in the steps of Anton Kovalyov and myself: disassociate yourself from any organization (like the CFC) that has no self-respect or any idea of what fair-play or rule of law is. There are plenty of tournaments in the US for you to play in and develop your talent. You are lucky that you live in a province where chess activity is growing. Nothing can stop you from reaching your potential…certainly don’t let the CFC discourage you from moving forward!
SPRAGGETT ON CHESS
Then Nigel was off to Uganda and then Ethiopia. No news about his successes there in any media, chess or otherwise. Curiously, however, on Karpov’s campaign site this week , with conspicuous silence, there appeared the Angolan Flag among the list of countries that was supporting Karpov (!!).
__________________________________________________________________
And it appears that yet one more ex-colleague of Karpov is siding with the Ilyumzhinov campaign: chessdom reports that Ivanchuk now openly favours the incumbent president! http://reports.chessdom.com/news-2010/ivanchuk-ukranian-media
”Ivanchuk supports Ilyumzhinov”
”The leader of Ukrainian chess – Vassily Ivanchuk in his interview to “Vzgliad iz Odessy” said he was in favour of the incumbent President of the International Chess Federation (FIDE) Kirsan Ilyumzhinov taking this position again.
Ivanchuk preferred Ilyumzhinov to the other candidate – the 12th World Champion Anatoly Karpov. Vassily’s reason was that with Ilyumzhinov the life of chess professionals has become better.
As for the version that it would be much easier for Karpov, who is better known in the sport world outside chess, than Ilyumzhinov, to “promote” inclusion of chess into the programme of the Olympics, Ivanchuk thinks that first, it is not a fact. Second, Ivanchuk, with all due respect to wrestlers and athletes, has no wish to participate in the same Olympic Games with them, and prefers that chess stays aside, having its own Olympiad, as it is now. ”
__________________________________________________________________
I suppose the juicy news today is that Ilyumzhinov’s lawyers have finally filed papers for a libel suit against Karpov. If you remember correctly, Karpov mentioned something a while back about Ilyumzhinov being ”corrupt”.
Ilymzhinov is quoted as saying “This is the first time during my 20-year career when I reported to a court. Now I applied to FIDE ethical commission in Italy and filed a claim to a (Moscow’s district court.” Ilymzhinov stressed, however, that there was nothing personal in this action against Karpov.
I am certain this lawsuit will be quietly dropped if and when Ilyumzhinov wins the election in September. However, it would be interesting to see the case go to trial: it is not that I am suprised that anyone would label Ilyumzhinov ”corrupt” (isn’t that part of the modern definition of a politician?) but I would very much like to see what concrete evidence Karpov could actually produce!
_____________________________________________________________________
No doubt the real reason for most of the silence in both camps is that this past week has just been business as usual: the FIDE election is not going to be won in the media, but in the back rooms. After all the huff and puff of endless communiques from Karpov’s campaign of how many European countries support him , the truth is that even if Kirsan were to give him all of Europe and all of the Americas, it won’t really matter much if Karpov does not make progress in Africa, Asia and the Pacific rim countries.
I understand that Karpov is running a very serious campaign, is actively calling his many chess-contacts that he has made over his long career and is asking for their support and help in swaying votes. Karpov is scheduled to visit South America sometime this month (Peru has been mentioned, but undoubtedly other stops will also be made). I hear that he intends to go to Malasia.
No doubt Karpov realizes that he is an underdog, but is serious about the FIDE presidency.
And what can we say of Kirsan’s campaign? If history is any indication, then we will only know how effective his backroom negotiating is once the election is held! But I would be surprised if Kirsan does not have already in his pocket some 60 to 70 votes. Being at the height of his popularity–and he is extremely popular today–barring a scandal or two, Kirsan has to be seen as the likely winner this time around.
______________________________________________________________________________
With Olympic time coming around again, it should be no surprise to any of us that the Selection Process has been botched (again) and filled with controversy. It seems to be par for the course. You would think that we would have learned by now how important it is to follow the rules as close to the letter as you can and to try to be transparent and fair at every juncture…but I realize that this might unreasonably assume that there is a will to learn from the past.
.jpg)
We have an absentee president who is bi-polar and can not handle stress, shows up at his government job about as often as his doctor lets him, has no internet at home because his wife won’t allow it. We should not be surprised that he is incapable of performing the responsibilities of his office. Eric Van Dusen’s most significant act this past year has been to deliberately shred potentially incriminating documents that might have tied many of his OCA buddies (including Hal Bond) to the disappearance of 120,000 dollars from Trillium.
Nobody knows where his side-kick VP is either, he has disappeared also. Clearly there is no leadership at all at any level and so it is not surprising that in this vacuum the problems that do arise do not get solved. ”Solutions” are not sought: decisions simply get imposed, as in the Bluvshtein/Livshits scandal.
If memory serves me well (it normally does!) in 2008 the CFC did not encounter any significant problems with the Selection Process–which is something of a record in the CFC!
That is because we had a president who–regardless of what you thought of his policies or how effective they were– was a hands on type of president and who was honest and would not stand for any tinkering with the rules or creative-bullshit interpretations.
And because David Lavin had been out of chess for such a long time (20 years or more) he had no idea of how much the ethics of the CFC leadership had deteriorated. For instance, on September 1, 2008 he wrote me with regards to a development regarding the 2008 National Team:
”One of the people involved in this year’s Olympiad has informed me that he has an anonymous sponsor who will donate $10,000 plus to the Men’s Olympiad team, but nothing to the women. The men’s team, including the current captain, would split the money equally and this anonymous person would become captain or co-captain…. I love sponsors, but the captaincy of the Olympic team should not be for sale. If it is, then perhaps we should auction it on eBay!”
What David did not realize is that this is exactly the way the CFC had been running since 2000! And worse: the CFC later reached the point where it literally sold the team…(you will have to wait for my long awaited article on Canadian chess for these details) To David Lavin–a very successful businessman–the kind of stuff that had been taken as ‘normal’ by previous CFC administrations was a horror story and it was totally unacceptable! And I think most Canadians would think the same way….David naturally refused the offer of the donation.
And I repeat what I insinuated above: when you have honest and competent leadership in the CFC executive, then you do not let problems fester unchecked until they develop into full blown scandals.
______________________________________________________________________________
Returning to this week’s favourite topic on the message boards in Canada, the 2010 National Team to represent Canada later in September, let me say that I don’t want to be too critical of those in charge of the Selection Process. I understand that when problems arose there was no one to turn to as the CFC executive has ceased to exist as a real body. (Hopefully that will change at this years AGM)
I congratulate Ron Livshits and Ilyia Bluvshtein for doing something that I have not seen happen before when similar scandals (or problems that have the potential to develop into scandals) have taken place in the CFC: coming forward and explaining their perspectives. This is a very positive precedent
I remember clearly when a similar selection scandal happened in 2006 (Chris Mallon was president): the CFC executive refused to even make public the name of the Olympiad Coordinator! There was zero transparency. Everything was a big secret. Even the contract that CFC signed with Brian Hartman selling the team was not made public: that is, it was RATIFIED by the governors without them ever seeing it!!
So, getting back to this year’s situation, I –as a member of the CFC–appreciate Ron and Ilyia coming forward. I believe that they both demonstrated good faith.
This does not mean that I agree with what they argue (I don’t!) or that I think they made the proper decisions once difficulties arose (I don’t think they tried very hard to look for alternate solutions. Instead they made easy, convenient and familiar decisions.). But given the circumstances, atleast we can see the process and where it failed.
As far as I am concerned, I believe that the Alberta Chess Association should take the CFC to court (they have the money to do this) for not following its own rules and sue them for every penny the CFC has.
Nikolay Noritsyn and Eric Hansen are both victims in this episode. Both are clearly talented youngsters and have a bright future ahead of them. No doubt Eric will have a bitter taste on his tongue for a long time to come whenever he thinks of the CFC, and that is understandable. When I was his age I experienced a similar victimization in dealing with the CFC and for 12 years I refused to have anything to do with the CFC and its National Team.
To Eric I suggest him follow in the steps of Anton Kovalyov and myself: disassociate yourself from any organization (like the CFC) that has no self-respect or any idea of what fair-play or rule of law is. There are plenty of tournaments in the US for you to play in and develop your talent. You are lucky that you live in a province where chess activity is growing. Nothing can stop you from reaching your potential…certainly don’t let the CFC discourage you from moving forward!
SPRAGGETT ON CHESS